تخطي إلى المحتوى

One of the world’s largest banks has chosen RSA ID Plus to build the foundation for a fully passwordless future—eliminating password-based vulnerabilities across internal employees, contractors, and high-value customers. The bank’s approach, the authenticators they chose, and what the deployment required are documented in the full case study.

Read on for the key questions that frame any large-scale passwordless banking initiative, an implementation framework based on how deployments like this actually progress, or download the complete case study.

What makes FIDO2 authentication phishing-resistant?

FIDO2 is the open standard that makes phishing-resistant, passwordless login possible. When a user registers a FIDO2 device, a unique cryptographic key pair is generated: the private key never leaves the device, and the public key is registered with the application. At login, the device signs a challenge that is cryptographically bound to the legitimate website—so even if a user is deceived into interacting with a fraudulent page, the authentication response cannot be used there.

Device-bound passkeys extend this further: the credential is tied to a single physical device and cannot be exported or cloned. For banking environments where insider threats and device sharing are real concerns, this level of binding provides the highest available assurance. RSA’s long-standing involvement in the FIDO Alliance puts it at the center of how these standards are developed and implemented.

How does RSA ID Plus support all user populations in a banking environment?

A bank’s user population is not uniform. Internal employees, contractors, high-net-worth customers, and mobile workers all have different device access, security requirements, and tolerance for friction. A passwordless deployment that works for traders on fixed workstations but fails for contractors on shared devices, or for customers on mobile, isn’t a complete solution.

RSA ID Plus addresses this by supporting the full spectrum of passwordless and MFA المقاوم للتصيد الاحتيالي methods—hardware security keys, device-bound mobile passkeys, and hardware tokens—across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments. Hybrid failover ensures that authentication remains available even when connectivity is disrupted, a critical requirement for financial services operations.

What does a phased passwordless implementation look like for a large bank?

Large-scale passwordless deployments don’t happen overnight. For a bank with tens of thousands of users across multiple systems and geographies, the move from password-based access to fully phishing-resistant authentication is a multi-phase program. Here is how deployments of this scale typically progress.

Phase 1. Assessment and planning

Before deploying any technology, the bank’s identity and security teams map every user population, system, and authentication use case. This means identifying which users need hardware keys versus mobile passkeys, which legacy systems require bridging solutions, and what the rollback plan is if a method fails in a particular environment. Planning at this phase prevents the gaps that surface mid-deployment and force costly rework.

Phase 2. Pilot deployment

A defined subset of users—typically a single business unit or a cross-functional pilot group—deploys the new authenticators in a controlled environment. The goal is not just technical validation but workflow validation: does the authentication experience work for how these users actually operate? Issues with provisioning, helpdesk processes, and user communication are far cheaper to resolve in a pilot than at scale.

Phase 3. Phased full-scale rollout

Rollout expands department by department or role by role, prioritizing the highest-risk user populations first—privileged access accounts, trading floor staff, compliance systems users. Each wave incorporates lessons from the previous one. For the bank in the case study, RSA Professional Services provided on-site support throughout this phase, ensuring the deployment stayed on track at every step.

الأسئلة الشائعة
كيف تنتقل البنوك من المصادقة متعددة العوامل (MFA) إلى المصادقة بدون كلمة مرور؟

Most banks transition in phases, starting with the highest-risk user populations—privileged users, trading floor staff, compliance system users—before expanding to the broader workforce and eventually customers. The transition doesn’t require replacing MFA everywhere at once: RSA ID Plus supports both MFA and passwordless methods simultaneously, so banks can move on their own timeline without disrupting access during the migration.

ما هي المزايا الأمنية التي توفرها مفاتيح المرور المرتبطة بالأجهزة للمؤسسات المالية؟

Device-bound passkeys tie authentication credentials to a specific physical device, meaning they cannot be exported, shared, or used from any other device—even if an attacker gains access to the user’s account credentials. For الخدمات المالية environments where credential theft is the primary attack vector, this binding eliminates the category of risk that traditional MFA methods leave open.

كيف تعمل المصادقة بدون كلمة مرور بالنسبة لمستخدمي الخدمات المصرفية عبر الهاتف المحمول وغيرهم من المستخدمين؟

RSA ID Plus supports multiple passwordless authenticator types—including hardware security keys for workstation-bound users and device-bound mobile passkeys for users who rely on smartphones—so each user population gets a method that fits how they actually work. This matters particularly in banking, where traders, branch staff, contractors, and customers all have distinct authentication environments that a single method cannot serve uniformly.

كم من الوقت يستغرق النشر على نطاق واسع لنظام الدخول بدون كلمة مرور في بيئة مصرفية؟

بالنسبة لبنك يعمل مع عشرات الآلاف من المستخدمين وفي مناطق جغرافية متعددة، عادةً ما يستغرق التنفيذ الكامل لنظام الدخول بدون كلمة مرور فترة تتراوح بين 18 و24 شهراً عند التخطيط له على مراحل. ويعتمد الجدول الزمني بشكل كبير على مدى تعقيد البنية التحتية الحالية للهوية، وعدد فئات المستخدمين المختلفة، ومدى الحاجة إلى تكامل الأنظمة القديمة. تفصّل دراسة الحالة النهج والجدول الزمني اللذين يتبعهما هذا البنك بالتحديد.

لماذا يُعد معيار FIDO2 هو المعيار المفضل للمصادقة المقاومة للتصيد الاحتيالي في القطاع المصرفي؟

يستخدم نظام FIDO2 تقنية التشفير بالمفتاح العام لربط عملية المصادقة بجهاز وتطبيق مسجلين محددين، مما يعني أنه لا يمكن إعادة استخدام استجابة المصادقة على موقع احتيالي — وهو ما يجعل التصيد الاحتيالي غير فعال من الناحية التقنية، وليس مجرد جعله أكثر صعوبة. تحتاج البنوك التي تتعامل مع معاملات عالية القيمة وبيانات عملاء حساسة إلى هذا المستوى من الضمان التشفيري؛ ولا يمكن لطرق المصادقة متعددة العوامل (MFA) القديمة القائمة على الأسرار المشتركة توفيره بغض النظر عن مدى تعقيد تلك الأسرار.

What RSA authenticators are available for banking passwordless deployments?

RSA offers three phishing-resistant authenticator options suited to different banking user populations: the سلسلة iShield Key 2 hardware key (FIDO2 + FIPS 140-3 certified, for the highest assurance environments), the RSA Authenticator App device-bound passkey (for mobile-first users), and the DS100 hardware token (supporting both FIDO2 passwordless and OTP for environments requiring fallback).

The case study details which authenticators this bank selected and why.

ابدأ تجربة مجانية

شكراً لاهتمامك بـ RSA.
اشترك